Federal appeals court rules against La. law requiring public schools to display Ten Commandments in every classroom

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today that a Louisiana law requiring public schools to permanently display a government-approved, Protestant version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom is unconstitutional. The decision upholds a federal district court’s November 2024 preliminary injunction in Rev. Roake v. Brumley, which prevents the defendant state officials and school boards from implementing the statute.

Pointing to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Stone v. Graham, which overturned a similar Kentucky law, the court of appeals held that Louisiana’s H.B. 71 violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. As the court explained, Stone remains good law that is binding on lower courts and “[u]nder Stone, H.B. 71 is plainly unconstitutional.” 

The court explained that “under the statute’s minimum requirements, the [Ten Commandments] posters must be indiscriminately displayed in every public school classroom in Louisiana regardless of class subject-matter,” and thus, if allowed to go up, ‘those displays will cause an ‘irreparable’ deprivation of [the Plaintiffs’] First Amendment rights.”

Represented by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ACLU, ACLU of Louisiana and Americans United for Separation of Church and State, with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP serving as pro bono counsel, the plaintiffs in Roake v. Brumley are a multifaith group of nine Louisiana families with children in public schools.  

“We are grateful for this decision, which honors the religious diversity and religious-freedom rights of public school families across Louisiana,” said the Rev. Darcy Roake, a plaintiff in the case along with her husband, Adrian Van Young. “As an interfaith family, we believe that our children should receive their religious education at home and within our faith communities, not from government officials.”

“We are pleased that the First Amendment rights of students and families are protected by this vital court decision,” said Patrick Elliott, legal director of the Freedom From Religion Foundation. 

“This is a resounding victory for the separation of church and state and public education,” said Heather L. Weaver, senior staff attorney for the ACLU’s Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “With today’s ruling, the Fifth Circuit has held Louisiana accountable to a core constitutional promise: Public schools are not Sunday schools, and they must welcome all students, regardless of faith.”

“This ruling will ensure that Louisiana families — not politicians or public-school officials — get to decide if, when and how their children engage with religion,” said Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. “It should send a strong message to Christian Nationalists across the country that they cannot impose their beliefs on our nation’s public-school children. Not on our watch.”

“Religious freedom — the right to choose one’s faith without pressure — is essential to American democracy,” said Alanah Odoms, executive director of the ACLU of Louisiana. “Today’s ruling ensures that the schools our plaintiffs’ children attend will stay focused on learning, without promoting a state-preferred version of Christianity.”

Jon Youngwood, co-chair of Simpson Thacher’s Litigation Department, added, “We are heartened by the Fifth Circuit’s well-reasoned and detailed opinion, which rests upon the wisdom of the First Amendment and the protections it affords regarding the separation of church and state.”

Today’s opinion is available online here.

Arkansas Families Sue to Block Law Mandating Ten Commandments in Public Schools

On June 11th, 2025, FFRF and a coalition filed a lawsuit on behalf of a multifaith group of seven families with children in Arkansas public schools to block a new state law requiring all public classrooms to display the Ten Commandments. 

Arkansas Act 573 of 2025 requires all public school classrooms and libraries to display the Ten Commandments on posters measuring at least 16-by-20 inches, positioned in a “conspicuous place.” The law specifies that the text must be printed in a size and typeface legible to anyone with average vision from anywhere in the room. Additionally, the statute mandates use of a specific version of the Ten Commandments associated with Protestant denominations—a version selected by state lawmakers rather than individual schools or communities.

The plaintiffs—who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist and nonreligious—assert that the statute violates longstanding U.S. Supreme Court precedent and the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The plaintiffs are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of Arkansas, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, and FFRF. Legal Director Patrick Elliot, Senior Litigation Counsel Sam Grover, and Staff Attorney Nancy Noet are serving as co-counsel. 

Quincy, MA Residents Sue to Stop Public Religious Statues

On May 28th, 2025, FFRF and a coalition filed a lawsuit on behalf of a group of Quincy, Massachusetts residents to halt the planned installation of two large religious statues of Catholic saints at the entrance of Quincy’s new public safety building. 

The lawsuit centers on Mayor Thomas P. Koch’s 2023 plan to construct two 10-foot-tall bronze statues of Catholic saints and place them at the entrance of the building, which will house the headquarters of Quincy’s police and fire departments. The statues would cost taxpayers at least $850,000, yet the public only learned of the plan in February 2025 through local media reports.

FFRF’s lawsuit argues that the planned religious statues violate Article 3 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights by subordinating other religions to the Catholic faith.

FFRF attorneys involved in this case are Legal Director Patrick Elliott and Legal Fellow Kyle Steinberg. Plaintiffs are also represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of Massachusetts, and Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. This case is in Norfolk Superior Court within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with case number 2582CV00576.

Jefferson County Residents Sue to Remove Ten Commandments Monument From Courthouse Lawn

Ten Commandments monument in front of the Jefferson County Courthouse
Ten Commandments monument in front of the Jefferson County Courthouse

On June 9, 2025, FFRF and a coalition of partners filed a lawsuit on behalf of multifaith and nonreligious residents of Jefferson County, Illinois, seeking removal of a seven-foot-tall Ten Commandments monument from the Jefferson County Courthouse lawn.

The monument was first placed in the courthouse lobby in 2024 by Jefferson County Sheriff Jeff Bullard. The monument was later moved to the front lawn of the courthouse. The lawsuit alleges that public dollars were used to relocate the monument to its current outdoor location.

The plaintiffs—both religious and nonreligious Jefferson County residents—argue that the monument violates the constitutional principle of religious freedom and undermines the rights of all county residents regardless of their faith or lack thereof.

The lawsuit was filed in Illinois’ 2nd Judicial Circuit, following the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners’ decision to retain the monument on county property. 

The plaintiffs are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of Illinois, and FFRF. Senior Litigation Counsel Sam Grover and Legal Fellow Hirsh M. Joshi are serving as co-counsel. 

FFRF Sued by Oklahoma State Department of Education for Advocacy Letters

State Superintendent Ryan Walters, Oklahoma State Department of Education
State Superintendent Ryan Walters

In March 2025, State Superintendent Ryan Walters and the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) filed a “SLAPP” suit against FFRF. This appears to be in response to letters FFRF sent to public schools in Oklahoma objecting to school-sponsored religious activities. A Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) is used to weaponize the legal system to punish and silence constitutionally protected speech. 

FFRF filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit for a lack of standing, failure to demonstrate subject matter jurisdiction, filing a frivolous lawsuit targeting First Amendment protected expression, and failure to state a claim. This motion also requests that the court impose sanctions on OSDE and Ryan Walters.

FFRF is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Oklahoma. This case is in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma with case number 6:25-cv-00094. 

Wisconsin Residents Challenge Special Tax Exemption for Church-Owned Properties

Annie Laurie Gaylor and Dan Barker in front of the Pres House for tax exemption lawsuit
FFRF co-presidents Annie Laurie Gaylor and Dan Barker in front of The Pres House

On January 14, 2025 FFRF and three Madison, WI residents filed a lawsuit challenging a tax law that exempts two rental properties owned by religious entities from paying property taxes.The law in question was specifically created to benefit the church-owned properties The Pres House and Lumen House Apartments in Madison, WI. The plaintiffs in this lawsuit are FFRF co-presidents Annie Laurie Gaylor and Dan Barker, taxpayer David Peterson, and FFRF itself. 

This tax exemption started in 2009 when the Wisconsin Legislature enacted a property tax exemption to benefit the Pres House Apartments, owned by the Presbyterian Student Center Foundation. Then, in 2013, the Legislature approved an amendment to benefit the Lumen House Apartments, owned by the St. Raphael’s Congregation within the Diocese of Madison. Both of these are designed for student renters and are extremely profitable properties. The Pres House Apartments’ current market value likely exceeds $25 million, with estimated property taxes owed in excess of $300,000 annually. Lumen House Apartments’ current market value likely exceeds $7.6 million, with estimated property taxes exceeding $94,000 annually.

The plaintiffs and Madison residents are forced to pay higher taxes to make up for the omission of these properties from the tax rolls. Further, it harms plaintiff FFRF, since it favors rental properties owned by two religious nonprofit organizations to the exclusion of all other nonprofits that may desire to run student apartments in the future. 

FFRF’s lawsuit argues that the exemption is unlawful under the Wisconsin Constitution on several counts. The exemption violates the Uniformity Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Establishment Clause of the Wisconsin Constitution. The exemption also is unconstitutional as it was approved via a private bill by the legislature. The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment striking down the exemption.

On March 21, 2025 the Wisconsin State Senate moved to intervene in this lawsuit in order to defend the tax exemption.

Plaintiffs are represented by FFRF Staff Attorney Sammi Lawrence, Staff Attorney Nancy Noet, Legal Director Patrick Elliott, and Pines Bach attorney Christa Westerberg in Madison, WI. 

Oklahoma Families Petition to Block Oklahoma Bible Mandate

On October 17, 2024, FFRF and a coalition filed a petition on behalf of Oklahoma families with the Oklahoma Supreme Court to block State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters’ mandate that all public schools incorporate the bible into their curricula. Additionally, the petition asks the court to stop the state from spending millions of taxpayer dollars on bibles to support the mandate.

On June 27, 2024, Ryan Walters issued a mandate that would require every public school in Oklahoma to incorporate the bible into the curriculum for grades 5-12. He requested $3 million in taxpayer money to purchase a version of the King James Bible. The edition he requested includes the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Pledge of Allegiance, and Bill of Rights.

The petition asserts that the bible-education mandate violates the Oklahoma Constitution’s religious freedom protections. This is because the government is spending public money to support religion, as well as favoring one religion over others by requiring the use of a Protestant version of the bible. Additionally, the mandate violates the Oklahoma Administrative Procedures Act and other state statutes because officials did not follow required rules for adopting new policies and for spending public money.

There are thirty-two plaintiffs, including fourteen public school parents, four public school teachers and three faith leaders. They are represented by FFRF, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the ACLU, the ACLU of Oklahoma Foundation, and Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law & Justice. FFRF Senior Counsel Samuel Grover and FFRF Legal Director Patrick Elliott are serving as co-counsel on the case. 

FFRF and Coalition Sue Over Law Requiring the Ten Commandments in Classrooms

On June 24, 2024 FFRF, the ACLU, the ACLU of Louisiana, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed a coalition lawsuit challenging a newly enacted law in Louisiana that would require all public schools to display the Ten Commandments.

This law mandates that every classroom display the Ten Commandments on “a poster or framed document that is at least 11 inches by 14 inches.” The commandments must be the “central focus” of the display and “printed in a large, easily readable font.” It also requires that a specific version of the Ten Commandments, which has been dictated by the state Legislature, be used for every display. Displays that depart from this state-sanctioned version of scripture would violate Louisiana law.

The complaint asserts that the statute violates long-standing U.S. Supreme Court precedent and the First Amendment. The Supreme Court previously overturned a similar state law in Stone v. Graham, holding that the separation of church and state bars public schools from posting the Ten Commandments in classrooms. No other state requires the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public schools. 

The complaint further alleges that Louisiana’s law “substantially interferes with and burdens” parents’ First Amendment right to direct their children’s religious education and upbringing, and that, in approving and mandating the display of a specific version of the Ten Commandments, the law runs afoul of the First Amendment’s prohibition against the government taking sides on questions of theological debate.

Plaintiffs are represented by the Freedom from Religion Foundation, the ACLU, the ACLU of Louisiana, and Americans United, with Simpson Thacher Bartlett LLP serving as pro bono counsel. FFRF Senior Counsel Samuel Grover and FFRF Legal Director Patrick Elliott are serving as co-counsel on the case. The lawsuit is in the Middle District of Louisiana District Court with case number 3:24-cv-00517-JWD-SDJ.

FFRF Monitors Morris County, New Jersey Church Grant Lawsuit

Morris county lawsuit victory image

FFRF and New Jersey taxpayer David Steketee filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit Mendham Methodist Church v. Morris County, NJ on August 10, 2023. The Foundation previously litigated and won a lawsuit in 2018 when the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously ruled that public money could not be used to repair a church.

On February 7, 2024, the district court ruled that FFRF and Steketee could not intervene directly in this new round of litigation because the court granted the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General’s separate motion to intervene and therefore FFRF and Steketee’s interests were now adequately represented by the AG’s office. FFRF is now weighing its options for preserving its involvement in the case, given that the churches’ ultimate goal is to undo its prior litigation victory.

At issue again is the funding of churches through Historic Preservation grants. The plaintiffs in this new case argue that previous U.S. Supreme Court decisions invalidated the decision that barred churches from participating in these funding programs and that the state’s Religious Aid Clause violates the U.S. Constitution’s Free Exercise Clause.

On July 19th, 2024, FFRF filed an amicus brief in support of the New Jersey Attorney General, who are an intervening party in this case.

On November 27, 2024, Judge Padin provisionally ruled in favor of the churches. This preliminary injunction allows churches to request historic preservation grants from Morris County as the case proceeds.

FFRF and Steketee are represented by local counsel Paul S. Grosswald. FFRF Senior Counsel Sam Grover is also continuing to work on the case on behalf of FFRF. This case is in the New Jersey District Court with the case number 2:23-cv-02347.

Freedom From Religion Foundation