The Freedom From Religion Foundation alerted the Hobby Lobby craft store chain a year ago about numerous distortions in its full-page July 4 ad featuring quotes supposedly showing the U.S. government is predicated on a god.
The company, founded and operated by preacherās son David Green, didnāt correct or alter those misleading claims and quotes when it ran a similar ad this July 4 in hundreds of newspapers.
āThis disinformation campaign is not benign,ā said Annie Laurie Gaylor, FFRF co-president. āThe ācraftyā owner of this national chain has not only sabotaged the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act, but is using his considerable fortune to establish a bible museum in Washington, D.C., intended to promote the āBig Lieā that America is a Christian nation. David Green has also commissioned a slanted bible curriculum that he intends to force into our public schools. Itās time to call Hobby Lobby out for its irresponsible misrepresentations.ā
FFRF called for a boycott of the chain last fall after the Supreme Court took its appeal. In late June, the all-male, all-Catholic majority of the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Hobby Lobby is exempt from the contraceptive mandate, based on Greenās claim that his religious rights are offended if women employees use company insurance for methods of which he disapproves.
āHobby Lobbyās quotes are meant to give the false impression that the U.S. is a Christian nation and that our nation ātrusts in God,ā ā noted FFRF Staff Attorney Andrew Seidel, who meticulously researched the quotes. His commentary appears on FFRFās interactive Web page.
The Web page contrasts the Hobby Lobby quotes with the original quotes. āBut, just like Hobby Lobbyās god, the quotes arenāt very trustworthy. They are wildly inaccurate in some cases,ā Seidel said.
Hobby Lobbyās baldest attempts to rewrite history are in quotes about two atheists, which make them appear religious or complimentary of religion. Its misleading quote of Achille Murat, whom its ad describes as āa French observer of America in 1832,ā is edited to make Murat seem pro-religion, when in fact he was criticizing religionās racist and proselytizing goals.
Similarly, Hobby Lobby grossly mischaracterizes a Supreme Court case that upheld a provision in freethinker Stephen Girardās last will and testament leaving $2 million (about $43 million today; who says nonbelievers arenāt generous?) to start a school for educating orphans, so long as āno ecclesiastic, missionary, and ministerā held any position in the school. Hobby Lobby falsely calls this a āunanimous decision commending and encouraging the use of the Bible in government-run schools.ā
Seidel asks: āIf Hobby Lobby canāt be trusted to quote fairly from historical documents, how can it possibly design an objective bible course for public schools?ā
FFRF ran 24 full-page ads last year, headlined āIn Reason We Trustā and celebrating Americaās āgodless Constitution,ā in daily newspapers around the country seeking to balance previous July 4 Hobby Lobby ads. Twenty-five ads were planned, but the news daily in Oklahoma City, where Hobby Lobby is based, censored FFRFās ad. View the ad here.
Gaylor noted that itās not possible to compete with Hobby Lobbyās scale of advertising. According to Forbes Magazine, Hobby Lobby has $3.3 billion in sales and 555 stores nationwide. This year, FFRF instead reacted to the Supreme Courtās Hobby Lobby ruling with a full-page ad in The New York Times on July 3. View the ad here.
āDonāt shop at Hobby Lobby. Your money is being used to work against contraceptive rights, to undermine secular education and to lobby for a Christian nation,ā she said.