RSS Feed

Outreach & Events

Past Conventions

2015 Convention  
Madison, Wis.

Events Archives

Appearances, Debates, Speeches and More

Foundation Books

ps tn

Lead Us Not Into Penn Station:Provocative Pieces

National Convention

September 15-17, 2017

Nontracts

women

Published by FFRF

Upcoming Events & Appearances

Appearances, Debates, Speeches and More

Lauryn Seering

Lauryn Seering

1NYTimesAdCroppedThe Freedom From Religion Foundation is delighted to announce that it has received a $100,000-plus boost to its legal fund via donations in Vice President Mike Pence's name.

FFRF began its "Give dollars and cents to counteract Pence" campaign in early November and, as of March 31, has raised $104,829. FFRF is a state/church watchdog with more than 27,000 largely freethinking (atheist and agnostic) members.

"We warmly thank the 1,905 donors to date who have given from $1 to $5,000," says FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor.

FFRF's ongoing campaign urges:

"Send a message to Mike Pence and his boss: The only wall we need is between church and state. Your gift to FFRF's legal fund in Mike Pence's name will be subversive (and deductible for income tax purposes). We'll use your kind donation to fight the imposition of religion by our government under the guise of 'religious liberty.' We'll put your donation to work to shore up the fence Pence needs to honor: the wall of separation between state and church."

Pence has been sent a letter totaling the donations to date, with a list of the names of donors who gave permission to be named (which is not being made public here to honor privacy).

Pence is considered to be the man behind many of the nominations and announcements of the current administration to propitiate the Religious Right. He once famously declared, "I'm a Christian, a conservative and a Republican in that order."

In their letter to Pence, Co-Presidents Dan Barker and Annie Laurie Gaylor note:
"We believe that elected officials should consider themselves: First) Americans; Second) public officials cognizant they have taken an oath of office to uphold a godless Constitution; and Third) citizens who do not misuse the authority of their secular office to promote their personal viewpoints on religion."

As a member of Congress, the evangelical Christian Pence co-sponsored "personhood" legislation calling for constitutional rights from the moment of fertilization, which is based on the religious notion of "ensoulment." Pence was an early leader in efforts to defund Planned Parenthood, based on religious objections.

As Indiana governor, he created a huge backlash by signing a bill to allow religion-based discrimination against LGBTQ and was forced to moderate the law. Under his reign, Indiana became one of the most restrictive states toward abortion in the country.

In January, a week after taking the oath of office to uphold the nation's godless and secular Constitution, Pence became the highest-ranking official to appear in person at the annual anti-abortion rally seeking to repeal Roe v. Wade.

The campaign will continue as long as the threat by the current administration continues in Washington, D.C.

1givedollarscents

 

1DanALGPodiumPhotoThe Freedom From Religion Foundation has filed a federal brief supporting its long-running challenge of preferential tax treatment that the IRS provides to ministers of the gospel.

FFRF's brief, filed before U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb on Wednesday, April 5, forcefully argues that the IRS is discriminating by allowing clergy — and only clergy — to exclude cash payments for housing from taxable income. FFRF Co-Presidents Dan Barker and Annie Laurie Gaylor, as well as the estate of President Emerita Anne Nicol Gaylor, were denied a similar benefit, although FFRF designates a housing allowance for them. Attorney Rich L. Bolton, who authored the brief, writes, "The Supreme Court has refused to allow government to preferentially favor religion with tax breaks that are not generally available to other taxpayers."

Besides the direct advancement of religion, the housing allowance fosters excessive government entanglement with religion. FFRF points out: "In order to ensure that this preferential tax benefit is limited to religious officials, §107(2) requires complex determinations relating to the tenets, principles and practices of those churches that provide their clergy with cash housing allowances."

The IRS and several churches that intervened in the case filed for summary judgment on March 8. FFRF's response brief debunks many of their claims. Both the IRS and the churches contend that the housing allowance, passed by Congress in 1954, is on par with housing provided more generally "for the convenience of the employer." But FFRF counters: "The historical evidence indicates that §107(2) was actually intended to provide a financial benefit to religious clergy without regard to any 'unique' housing relationships." The principal sponsor, Rep. Peter Mack, argued during hearings, "Certainly, in these times when we are being threatened by a godless and anti-religious world movement we should correct this discrimination against certain ministers of the gospel who are carrying on such a courageous fight . . . caring for our spiritual welfare."

FFRF and its members first brought suit to challenge the housing allowance in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The case was later moved to Wisconsin, after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in another case limiting who may challenge certain government tax expenditures.

In 2013, U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb ruled in FFRF's favor, finding that the clergy housing allowance was unconstitutional. She wrote that "the exemption provides a benefit to religious persons and no one else, even though doing so is not necessary to alleviate a special burden on religious exercise." The decision provoked a national near-hysterical outcry from churches and ministers, with practically every denomination, including the Unitarians and liberal Jewish, filing briefs against FFRF. FFRF has referred to the case as "David vs. Goliath" because virtually all religious groups weighed in against FFRF's challenge to religious privilege.

In 2014, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Barker and Gaylor did not have standing to bring the case because they hadn't yet sought a refund of their housing allowance from the IRS. Accordingly, Barker and Gaylor filed for a tax refund in 2015 and were denied a housing allowance by the IRS. In a June 27, 2016, letter the IRS stated, "IRC Section 107 specifically requires that to exclude a housing allowance from income you must be a minister of the gospel. The IRS does not have the authority to interpret this to include anyone other than those who meet this definition." This proves the point FFRF is attempting to make in its lawsuit.

"The discriminatory subsidy given to members of the clergy should be struck down," says Barker.

Untaxed housing payments to clergy are estimated by Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation to amount to $800 million per year. Pastors paid a housing allowance may deduct not just mortgages, rents and property taxes but most money spent on home improvements, including "furnishings, utilities, garage, etc." Ministers, retired ministers and many others, such as Jewish cantors or even parochial school basketball coaches with ordinations, may fully deduct from taxable income the amount of their salary designated as a "housing allowance."

The case, Gaylor v. Lew, Case No. 3:16-cv-00215-bbc, is before Judge Barbara Crabb, U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin. Other documents may be found here

 

FFRF is a non-profit, educational organization. All dues and donations are deductible for income-tax purposes.

FFRF has received a 4 star rating from Charity Navigator

Contribute to Nonbelief Relief

FFRF privacy statement