RSS Feed

Outreach & Events

Past Conventions

2015 Convention  
Madison, Wis.

Events Archives

Appearances, Debates, Speeches and More

Foundation Books

ps tn

Lead Us Not Into Penn Station:Provocative Pieces

National Convention

September 15-17, 2017

Nontracts

women

Published by FFRF

Upcoming Events & Appearances

Appearances, Debates, Speeches and More

Lauryn Seering

Lauryn Seering

%250 %America/Chicago, %2017

Obituary: Donald E. Kasparek

Gorsuch slide
The Freedom From Religion Foundation is providing the Senate hard-hitting questions to ask Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.

The state/church watchdog group has submitted a number of queries to the Senate Judiciary Committee to pose to Gorsuch at his confirmation hearing on Monday, March 20.

Most of FFRF's questions relate to Gorsuch's views on the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which President Thomas Jefferson described as erecting "a wall of separation between church and state."

But given Gorsuch's background and 2006 book, "The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia," FFRF's most pointed inquiries are directed at Gorsuch's statements about "the inviolability of life."

Questions FFRF would like to pose include whether:

• Gorsuch draws "any distinction between 'assisted suicide,' in which the patient requests help dying, and homicide?"
• Gorsuch considers "the right to privacy extends to the medical decisions of a pregnant woman and her doctor?"
• Gorsuch supports federal and state death penalties?

Gorsuch notably concurred as a justice on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby's claim that as a for-profit corporation, its religious rights were violated due to women employees selecting forms of contraception the founder disapproved of. Hobby Lobby ultimately prevailed at the U.S. Supreme Court, when the high court notoriously ruled Hobby Lobby had a right to be exempted on religious grounds from complying with the contraceptive mandate in the Affordable Care Act.

In that concurrence, Gorsuch wrote: "All of us face the problem of complicity. All of us must answer for ourselves whether and to what degree we are willing to be involved in the wrongdoing of others."

FFRF would like Gorsuch to respond to two questions related to that statement:

• "Is there no limit to what actions an individual or a corporation can refuse to take in the name of their religious beliefs?"
• "Do you truly believe that a female employee who uses common forms of contraception can be characterized as engaging in 'wrongdoing'?"

Under the increasingly hostile judicial attitudes toward standing doctrine, FFRF seeks to ask Gorsuch how he'll ensure that laws meant to protect society are actually enforceable?

FFRF also wonders why we need laws like the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, given the protections under the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause. The act was the basis of the Hobby Lobby ruling. State versions are spawning great discord as legislators seek to exempt places of public accommodation from serving or working with citizens based on religious objections, such as objections to those who are LGBT.

But FFRF says it believes the most important question for Gorsuch to answer is: "As a justice of the Supreme Court, will you commit to upholding the letter of the law even if doing so conflicts with your personal religious beliefs?"

The questions are a follow-up to FFRF's preliminary statement about Gorsuch indicating it is "highly apprehensive" about his views on the First Amendment and the right to privacy. Currently, five of the justices on the Supreme Court are Roman Catholic — four of them ultraconservative. 

In its original statement FFRF noted Gorsuch would be the lone Episcopalian if appointed, thereby perhaps giving a little diversity to the court. (The other two justices are Jewish; currently none is Protestant or openly nonreligious; the late Justice Antonin Scalia, whom Gorsuch is nominated to replace, was Roman Catholic.) FFRF notes, in fact, that Gorsuch's background is Roman Catholic. Gorsuch converted to Episcopalianism as an adult, but was raised Roman Catholic and attended Roman Catholic school for a number of years. His Catholic mother, Anne Gorsuch, has been described as "fervently antiabortion" by The New York Times. 

For more background, read FFRF Co-President Dan Barker's blog "Beware of Gorsuch's disturbing views on abortion and death with dignity," a detailed analysis on Gorsuch's views on assisted suicide.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a nonprofit organization representing more than 27,000 members across the nation, including members in every state. Its purposes are to protect the constitutional principle of separation between religion and government, and to educate the public about nontheism.

1TeutopolisCoachPrayer
An Illinois school district coached its employees on the Constitution after the Freedom From Religion Foundation complained about its overly religious staff.

Personnel from the Teutopolis Community Unit School District #50, including basketball coach Mike Walker, prayed with student athletes after a recent game against Pana High School. The principal of Pana High School, Gayle McRoberts, posted a picture of the prayer on social media.

FFRF reminded the school district that it is illegal for public school athletic coaches to lead their teams in prayer or participate in student prayers.

"It is unconstitutional for public school employees to participate in the religious activities of their students," FFRF Legal Fellow Ryan Jayne wrote to Superintendent Bill Fritcher. "Federal courts have held that even a public school coach's silent participation in student prayer circles is unconstitutional." 

FFRF's letter jolted the Teutopolis Community Unit School District #50 into action. It held a staff meeting a few days ago where the Constitution was carefully explained.

"As stated Friday morning, we can have respect for religion, but by federal law, cannot endorse it while acting as a school employee," Fritcher wrote in a memo shared with FFRF. "Therefore, when our students choose to participate or initiate a student-led prayer, our employees may not participate. Please remove yourself from the activity so that it cannot be assumed that you are initiating, organizing, endorsing or participating in prayer."

Fritcher clearly delineated state-church separation principles for everyone to comply with.

"It is important that you follow this directive to refrain from praying with your teams," he stated. "Courts have ruled that participation in prayer with your teams amounts to endorsement of prayer. Failure to comply with this directive could result in disciplinary action." 

FFRF is glad that it provided the impetus for a constitutional tutorial.

"We don't like to single out individual staff, but public school employees need to know basic constitutional principles," says FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor. "We're pleased that we were the reason for a refresher course."

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a national organization dedicated to the separation of state and church, with more than 27,000 members and chapters all over the country, including almost 900 and a Chicago chapter in Illinois.

FFRF is a non-profit, educational organization. All dues and donations are deductible for income-tax purposes.

FFRF has received a 4 star rating from Charity Navigator

Contribute to Nonbelief Relief

FFRF privacy statement