FFRF sues over Florida lit censorship

The Freedom From Religion Foundation filed a lawsuit June 13 in U.S. District Court in Florida against the Orange County School Board in Orlando for censoring distribution of freethought materials while allowing unfettered distribution of the Christian bible.

Plaintiffs are FFRF, its Co-Presidents Annie Laurie Gaylor and Dan Barker, and David Williamson, who heads the Central Florida Freethought Community, a new FFRF chapter. Distribution of limited freethought literature was allowed on May 2, the National Day of Prayer.

The distribution was organized in response to a so-called ā€œpassiveā€ bible distribution in January, when World Changers of Florida evangelists in 11 public schools were permitted to hawk bibles and promote religion.

FFRF asserts violation of its rights under the First Amendment (viewpoint discrimination and prior restraint) and 14th Amendment (equal protection).

Orange County Public Schools insisted on vetting the freethought literature from FFRF and other secular groups. It censored many of the materials, including Letter to a Christian Nation, Sam Harrisā€™ book; ā€œThe Truth,ā€ an essay by Robert G. Ingersoll; Jesus Is Dead, a book by Robert Price, professor of philosophy and religion; Madalyn Murray Oā€™Hairā€™s book What on Earth Is an Atheist?; Why I am Not a Muslim, a book by Ibn Warraq, and several FFRF ā€œnontracts,ā€ including ā€œDear Believer,ā€ ā€œWhy Jesus?ā€ ā€œWhat Does the Bible Say About Abortion?ā€ and ā€œAn X-Rated Book.ā€

Plaintiffs Barker and Gaylor wrote several of the censored pamphlets.

The school district prohibited one book because its message that Jesus was not crucified or resurrected ā€œis age inappropriate for the maturity levels of many of the students in high school.ā€ However, the bible that the school approved for distribution claims that Jesus was crucified and resurrected. ā€œPermitting one viewpoint (the crucifixion and resurrection occurred) and censoring the opposing viewpoint (the crucifixion and resurrection did not occur) is unconstitutional,ā€ FFRFā€™s complaint states.

FFRF seeks a permanent injunction barring future viewpoint discrimination and prior restraint of its speech. The plaintiffs intend to repeat the distribution every school year, unless the school prohibits all such distributions, including bibles.

Christian favoritism

On Jan. 16, World Changers distribute New International Version bibles to students. WCF ā€œsupport[s] the biblical account of creation, including having creation theory taught in our public schoolsā€ and ā€œspeak[s] out against humanistic views contrary to the biblically based founding fathersā€™ constitutional vision.ā€

The complaint asserts that the district ā€œdid not object to a single word in [the WCF] Bible, but approved it fully and without comment.ā€

The plaintiffs contend that public schools shouldnā€™t allow literature distributions by any outside group and told the school district that by letter before the World Changers event. Williamson reiterated that position at a Jan. 29 pre-agenda meeting of the school board. 

FFRF encouraged the district to adopt a policy that ā€œprohibits outside groups from turning schools into religious battlegrounds while preserving the distribution system for the benefit of the schoolā€ and suggested model language.

After the district refused, FFRF asked for permission to distribute secular materials. Williamson submitted the secular groupsā€™ literature Jan. 29 for approval. Included were nine ā€œnontracts,ā€ five brochures, eight books, one essay and one sticker. Three books were voluntarily withdrawn in order to speed the approval process after stonewalling by the district.

The district prohibited four of FFRFā€™s five books, leaving part of one (Part III of Thomas Paineā€™s The Age of Reason) and several small pamphlets. ā€œGood Without Godā€ stickers were prohibited.

The complaint lists dozens of factual examples of how secular materials and secular volunteers were treated differently from the World Changers and the biblical material:

ā€¢ The district objected to the Harris book for describing ā€œthe sacrifice of virgins, killing and eating of children in order to ensure the future fertility of mothers, feeding infants to sharks, and the burning of widows so they can follow their husbands into the next world.ā€ FFRFā€™s complaint notes that the concepts flagged as age inappropriate all appear in the bible.

ā€¢ WCF put up interactive whiteboards, had volunteers staffing tables and talking with students and passed out invitations to worship at the Orlando Wesleyan Church. Plaintiffs attempted to pass out a pizza party invitation but were censored at several schools. Freethought volunteers had to wait up to an hour at some schools to set up.

FFRF Staff Attorney Andrew Seidel, who negotiated the distribution with the district, noted that itā€™s not merely the number of books and materials ā€” itā€™s the volume. He calculated that while the average bible has about 1,950 pages, the secular books totaled 1,184 pages.

Seidel added, ā€œMoreover, there are actually 66 books in bible (give or take depending on your particular religion). Either way you look at it, the bible is more massive than all the materials we are asking to distribute put together.ā€

Plaintiffsā€™ attorneys are Jerry Jeffreys, trial counsel; Steven Brady, co-counsel; and Seidel, pro hac vice co-counsel. Jeffreys and Brady are working pro bono.

FFRF thanks chapter director David Williamson for serving as principal plaintiff and for his diligence in coordinating the literature distribution with FFRF, Secular Student Alliance, American Humanist Association and Florida Atheists, Secular Humanists and American Atheists.

Read the legal complaint at:
ffrf.org/uploads/legal/OCSchools-Distribution-Complaint.pdf

Freedom From Religion Foundation