RSS Feed

Outreach & Events

Past Conventions

2014 Convention  
Los Angeles, Calif.

Videos & More!

Events Archives

Appearances, Debates, Speeches and More

National Convention

October 9-11, 2015

Upcoming Events & Appearances

Appearances, Debates, Speeches and More

Lauryn Seering

Lauryn Seering

%250 %America/Chicago, %2015

Voting in a Church? Why Not?

%250 %America/Chicago, %2015

Time to reject bible-based death penalty

Statement by Annie Laurie Gaylor
Co-President
Freedom From Religion Foundation

While Wisconsin's reputation for progressivism is sadly overrated, there is one fact, as a state native, that I remain very proud of: Wisconsin was the first U.S. state to abolish the death penalty for all crimes. (A few states never adopted capital punishment in the first place.)

Wisconsin has only executed one person since becoming a state in 1848. John McCaffary was hanged in 1851 for drowning his wife Bridgett. He dangled gruesomely for 20 minutes while slowly strangling, as a crowd of thousands in Kenosha watched in horror. The death penalty was repealed in 1853.

Today, some 32 states still officially have capital punishment on their books, plus the federal government and the military. This puts the U.S. in the company of the worst despotic regimes and Islamist states.

While the root source of capital punishment may not be solely biblical, in the Western world, the bible is the sourcebook for the death penalty. "Life, for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth," as Exodus 21:22 barbarically commands. "An eye for an eye will leave everyone blind," as Gandhi reputedly observed.

The crimes of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the convicted Boston Marathon bomber, are incomprehensible, horrific and cold-blooded. But it's cold-blooded for the U.S. government to execute him. It's so obvious: If killing is wrong, how can it be right for the government itself to sentence someone to death?

And, of course, Tsarnaev will become a martyr, at much greater taxpayer expense than the cost of keeping him imprisoned.

Perhaps not surprising in a nation where 70% are nominally Christian, 60% of Americans are in favor of the death penalty for Tsarnaev. But it's a credit to Massachusetts, which itself opposed the federal government's decision to seek the death penalty and has outlawed the state death penalty, that the figures were reversed: Only 30% supported the death penalty in this case.

One Boston couple, Bill and Denise Richard, lost a son in the bombing and were both injured. Their daughter lost a leg. But they still publicly opposed the death penalty for Tsarnaev. They wrote a poignant plea in the Boston Globe, "To end the anguish, drop the death penalty."

"We understand all too well the heinousness and brutality of the crimes committed. We were there. We lived it. The defendant murdered our 8-year-old son, maimed our 7-year-old daughter, and stole part of our soul." A death sentence, they noted, "could bring years of appeals and prolong reliving the most painful day of our lives."

They concluded, "We honor those who were lost and wish continued strength for all those who were injured. We believe that now is the time to turn the page, end the anguish, and look toward a better future — for us, for Boston, and for the country."

It's time for the United States and the individual states to likewise "turn the page, end the anguish, and look toward a better future," by joining the rest of the civilized world in rejecting the death penalty.

%250 %America/Chicago, %2015

Secularists are on the march

Statement by Annie Laurie Gaylor
Co-President
Freedom From Religion Foundation

I've been saying for years that public officials, and the media, haven't caught up with the changing secular demographics in the United States. The newest Pew report on the growing population of religiously "unaffiliated," released last week, begs for attention by public officials and political candidates.

As Pew reported, "The Christian share of the U.S. population is declining, while the number of U.S. adults who do not identify with any organized religion is growing." Christians have dropped 8% in just seven years, to 70.6%, while the percentage of those of us who describe ourselves as atheists, agnostics or "nothing in particular" has jumped more than 6%, from 16% to 22.8%. About a third of millennials remain solidly secular.

As New York Times writer Charles Blow points out in a recent column ("Unaffiliated and underrepresented"), 92% of Congress identifies as Christian, 5% Jewish, 0.4% both Buddhist or Muslim and only 0.2% "unaffiliated." The "unaffiliated" would be Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., not that these figures are fully credible.

While believing in God may be a "gotcha" issue, and it may be far easier to raise money if you're part of the Religious Right, there have always been closeted members of Congress. After all, a Pew poll last year found that not believing in God is the most negative trait a presidential candidate could have, so what ambitious national politician is going to look forward to coming out of that closet?

Blow correctly wonders "how long can this overrepresentation of Christianity and underrepresentation of the unaffiliated last in government?"

He also points to the paranoia of the Religious Right, which is panicking over what I call the "re-Enlightenment" in the United States, acting as if a return to secularism is an attack on Christianity. "The issue in America," Blow observes, "is less that Christians are persecuted as much as peevish."

The secular movement has the power to swing elections. Yet who is courting our vote?

If nonreligious Americans even get a nod, it's been as a mere afterthought by recent presidents in the context of religious freedom proclamations. Minorities much less statistically significant than the "nones" are routinely courted, while seculars have to pinch ourselves to know we exist. The fact that atheists and nonbelievers remain at the bottom of the totem poll in social acceptance shows the continuing domination of blind faith in our society.

Blow points out that the "unaffiliated" supported Obama over Romney by 51% in the last presidential election. For now, Blow writes, "unaffiliated is an identity as yet unaware of its power."

The Freedom From Religion Foundation, while devoutly apolitical and nonpartisan, has long been aware of the power of secularists. We called attention to our presence in the last presidential election, releasing "I'm Secular and I Vote" T-shirts, buttons, and bumper stickers (still available at ffrf.org/shop). We've also sponsored "I'm Secular and I Vote" billboards.

We nonreligious are purists when it comes to secular government. At nearly 23% of the U.S. population and growing, it's time to flex some secular muscle and demand that politicians not only pay us some heed, but start promoting secular platforms.

We're seeing the heartening and overdue rejection of religious influence when it comes to gay rights and marriage equality. Now it's time to direct some attention to the right to be free of religious dogma when it comes to women and reproductive rights, increasingly under attack. We need a reason-based, not faith-based, response to climate change. We need to safeguard secular education and reject schemes to defund public education.

"Freedom depends on freethinkers" is FFRF's motto, coined by "Born Again Skeptic" author and early FFRF member Ruth Hurmence Green. Freethought is not only an intellectually respectable position —it's a must for progress, for humane government and for world peace.

FFRF is a non-profit, educational organization. All dues and donations are deductible for income-tax purposes.

FFRF has received a 4 star rating from Charity Navigator

 

FFRF privacy statement

AAI-LOGO

FFRF is a member of Atheist Alliance International.